New stormwater priority pollutants: comparison with international classifications, quality criteria and monitoring programs

Authors

  • Eva Eriksson Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Anders Baun Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Peter Steen Mikkelsen Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Anna Ledin Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/Eco-Tech.2005.021

Keywords:

Hazard assessment; Monitoring programme; Stormwater; Xenobiotic compounds

Abstract

Stonnwater discharges are generated by rain runoff from land and impervious areas such as
roads, parking lots, and roofs during rainfall and snowmelt events. It contains an array of
different pollutants such as organic matter, particles, heavy metals, inorganic trace elements
and xenobiotic organic compounds (XOCs). It is important to consider the hazards concerning
these pollutants when considering design of monitoring strategies, comparing different
handling strategies for stonnwater utilisation, treatment methods and discharge to receiving
waters.
In the EU 5FP funded Daywater project a list of selected stonnwater priority pollutants
(SSPP) was identified, which has been used for assessing pollutant sources and fluxes,
behaviour and fate during passage through best management practices (BMPs) and the
environmental risk associated with their subsequent dispersal. The methodology used;
Chemical Hazard Identification and Assessment Tool (CHIAT) aims at selecting relevant
SSPP e.g. and can be used for development and evaluation of monitoring programmes.
The Daywater SSPP-list consists of water quality parameters (BOD, COD, SS, nitrogen, pH
and phosphorus); metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Pt and Zn); PAHs (naphthalene, pyrene and
benzo[a]pyrene); herbicides (pendimethalin, phenmedipham, glyphosate and terbutylazine);
and other XOCs (nonylphenol ethoxylates, pentachlorophenol, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
PCB-28 and MTBE) representing persistent, ubiquitous compounds and compounds deriving
from specific anthropogenic sources.
The list was compared with data found within the Danish nation-wide monitoring
programmes for the aquatic environment (NOV A2003 and NOV ANA); European monitoring
programmes; pollutant registers; individual European legislation; as well as quality criteria
and limit values. The comparison reveals differences since most of these are set on arbitrary
criteria or focuses on the current EU legislation. Overlaps was found with the studied
programmes, but also some "new" compounds was selected; platinum, herbicides and MTBE
which indicate that revision of existing monitoring programmes is needed and that stonnwater
contains more hazardous pollutants than previously anticipated.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Grum, M., Jörgensen, A.T., Johansen, R.M., Linde, J.J., 2005. The effect of climate change on urban drainage: An evaluation based on regional climate simulations. In: Eriksson E., Geny-Fuhrman H., Vollertsen J., Ledin A, Hvitved-Jacobsen T. and Mikkelsen P.S. (Eds) 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, 21-26 August 2005, Copenhagen/Denmark, Draft papers, CD-ROM.

Makepeace, D.K., Smith, D.W., Stanley, SJ., 1995. Urban stormwater quality: summary of contaminant data. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 25, 93-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389509388476

Eriksson, E., 2002. Potential and problems related to reuse of water in households. Ph.D. thesis. Institute of Environment & Resources, Technical University of Denmark.

Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Mikkelsen, P.S., Ledin, A., 2005a. Selection of stormwater priority pollutants. In: Eriksson, E., Gene-Fuhrman, H., Vollertsen, J., Ledin, A., Hvitved Jacobsen, T. & Mikkelsen, P. S. (eds.): 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, 21-26 August 2005, Copenhagen/Denmark, I 0ICUD, Draft Papers. CDROM, Institute of Environment & Resources, Technical University of Denmark & Section of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg University, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Mikkelsen, P.S., Ledin, A., 2005b. Chemical hazard identification and assessment tool for evaluation of stormwater priority pollutants. Water Science and Technology 51(2),47-55.

Ledin, A., Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Aabling, T., Mikkelsen P.S., 2005. CHIAT - Chemical hazard identification and assessment tool - A methodology for chemical risk assessment of different strategies for handling of storm- and wastewater. V A-Forsk, Svenskt Vatten AB, Stockholm. V A-Forsk rapport, 2005-09. (in Swedish).

European Commission, 2003. Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. 2nd version.

US EPA, 2005. Water quality criteria. Available on: http://oaspub.epa.gov/wqsdatabase/wqsi_epa_criteria.rep_parameter (2005-09-15).

European Chemicals Bureau, 2005. The Priority Lists Existing Substances Regulation (ESR). Available on: http://ecb.jrc.it/existing-chemicalsl (2005-06-14).

J Agences de !'Eau, 2000. River Water Quality Assessment System (Systeme D'evaluation de la qualite de l'eau des cours d'eau. S.E.Q. Eau (version I) Principles Generaux. (in French).

Parkhurst D.L., Appelo C. A. J., 2001. PHREEQC. Downloaded from http://water.usgs.gov/software/phreeqc.html (Oct. 2001).

US EPA, 2005. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons -- 16-PAH. Available on: http://iaspub.epa.gov/srs/srs_proc_qry.navigate?P_SUB_ID=17134016 (2005-10-10).

European Commission, 2000. Establishing the list of priority substances in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC. Available on:

http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/1_331/1_33120011215en00010005.pdf (2005-08-29).

United Nations, 1998. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Long-Range Transboundary (LRTAP). Available on: http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/status/lrtap_s.htm (2005-08-29).

Stockholm POPs, 2005. Information available on: http://www.pops.in (2005-06-15).

WWF, 2005. Stockholm Convention New POPs: Screening Additional POPs Candidates. Available on: http://www.worldwildilfe.org/toxics (2005-06-15).

OSPAR, 2004. OSPAR List of Chemicals for Priority Action, OSPAR convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-east Atlantic meeting of the OSPAR Commission (OSPAR) Reykjavik: 28 Junes- 1 July 2004, 2004-12, A7, § 7.3.

OSPAR, 2002. OSPAR List of Substances of Possible Concern, 2002-17. Available on: http://www.ospar.org

Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals (BUA), 2005. BUA reports. Available on: http://www.gdch.de/taetigkeiten/bua/berichte_e.htm (2005-10-03) (in German).

Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, 2005. State of the Environment Norway, List of Priority Substance. Available on: http://www.environment.no/templates/pagewide__ 3280.aspx (2005-10-03).

HELCOM, 1998. HELCOM recommendation 19/5, HELCOM objective with regard to hazardous substances, 26 March 1998. Available on: www.helcom.fi (2005-10-03).

HELCOM, 2005. HELCOM guidelines for the fourth Baltic Sea pollution load compilation (PLC-4) (www.helcom.fi; 2005-10-03).

Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy, 1996. Statutory Order No. 921 of 8 October 1996 on quality standards for water bodies and emission standards for discharges of certain hazardous substances to watercourses, lakes or the sea. (in Danish).

European Commission, 2000. 2000/479/EC: Commission Decision of 17 July 2000 on the implementation of a European pollutant emission register (EPER) according to Article 15 of Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC). Available on: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ippc/eper/ (2005-10-03).

UK and Welsh EPA, 1998. Statutory Instrument 1998 No. 389 The Surface Waters (Dangerous Substances) (Classification) Regulations 1998. Available on: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1998/19980389.htm (2005-06-15).

Northern Ireland Department of the Environment, 1998. Statutory Rule 1998 No. 397. Surface Waters (Dangerous Substances) (Classification) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1998. Available on: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/sr/sr1998/19980397.htm (2005-06-15).

Swedish EPA, 1999. Bedömningsgrunder for miljökvalitet. Sjöar och vattendrag. Rapport 4913. (in Swedish).

US EPA, 2005. Water quality criteria for nonylphenol. Available on: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nonylphenol/draftfs.htm (2005-09-15).

European Commission, 2005. Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs); EU MRL Informal coordination of MRLs established in Directives 76/895/EEC, 86/362/EEC, 86/363/EEC, and 90/642/EEC. Available on: http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/protection/resources/mrl_pesticide.pdf

Danish EPA, 2000. NOV A-2003, Programbeskrivelse for det nationale program for overviigning af vandmilj0et i Danmark, 1998-2003. Redeg0relse nr. 1 2000. (in Danish).

Danish EPA, 2005. Laboratorier udpeget til analyser for miljofremmede stoffer og tungmetaller under NOV ANA revision. MILJ0styrelsen V andenheden I. maj 2005, J.nr. 2040-0008, SR/KISNandenheden. (in Danish).

UK-EPA, 2005. Pollution Inventory Substances. Available on: http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/business/444255/446867/255244/?version=l&lang=_e (2005-09-15).

ECB, 2005. ESIS: European chemical Substances Information System, version 4.00. Available on http://ecb.jrc.it/existing-chemicals!' (2005-08-29).

European Commission, 1998. Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October I 998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC.

European Fuel Oxygenates Association (EFOA), 2005. ECETOC/EFOA Risk Assessment Report for Existing Substances. Available on: http://www.efoa.org (March 2005).

Kayhanian, M., Singh, A., Suverkropp, C., Borroum S., 2003. Impact of annual average daily traffic on highway runoff pollutant concentrations. Journal of Environmental Engineering 129(11), 975-990. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:11(975)

Downloads

Published

2019-10-15