Optimization of the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method for determination of bisphenols and hormones wastewater
Keywords:Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction, Hormones, Bisphenols, wastewater Design of Experiments, Optimization, Liquid Chromatography
The Dispersive Liquid-liquid Microextraction (DLLME) is a technique of extraction and concentration of compounds in aqueous matrices of high complexity, including effluent and environmental samples. The objective of this study was to find the best condition for a joint extraction/recovery for bisphenol A (BPA), bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol AF (BPAF), Benzophenone (BZP), 17α-Ethynylestradiol (17a-EE), 17β-Estradiol (17β-E) and estrone (EST) by DLLME using Design of Experiments (DoE) aiming at quantify these compounds in sewage samples from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Analytes were identified and quantified using a Xevo TQD®, Quadrupole (UPLC-MS/MS Waters) equipment. The selection of variables and conditions considered relevant for DLLME optimization were performed using a Plackett-Burman Design (PB) followed by a Central Composite Design (CCD) for a joint optimization. After the optimization, the best extraction condition was applied in two real wastewater samples (raw and treated) from a WTTP located in Rio de Janeiro. The recoveries obtained with the raw and treated wastewater samples for all compounds of interest were within the range from 80 to 120%. The amounts of target analytes found in raw and treated wastewater samples were, respectively: BPA (150 ng mL-1, 0.103 ng mL-1), BPS (18.2 ng mL-1, D-detected), BPF (0.091 ng mL-1, D), BPAF (0.005 ng mL-1, 0.016 ng mL-1), BZP (0.923 ng mL-1, 0.923 ng mL-1), 17a-EE (1.17 ng mL-1, 1.02 ng mL-1), 17β-E (1.01 ng mL-1, D), EST (1.10, D). The association between DLLME methodology and UPLC-MS/MS met the validation requirements adopted and enables high analytical standards. One of the additional advantages of applying this extraction technique is the low analytical cost per analysis (around $0.20) and the low volume of sample required, which makes possible to conduct chromatographic analyses of a large number of samples quickly, with simplicity and efficiency, making the entire process more sustainable.
Copyright (c) 2020 Marco Tadeu Gomes Vianna, Rodrigo Coutinho, Marcia Marques
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.