Natural recovery of man-made disturbances in the west Siberian arctic and recommended species for rehabilitation

Authors

  • Olga V. Khitun Linnéuniversitetet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/Eco-Tech.2003.005

Abstract

Vast areas in the Arctic are faced with widespread threats ranging from gas and oil
development to tourism (Sippola et al., 1995; Crawford, 1997; Forbes et al., 2001). East
European and West Siberian parts of Russian Arctic have important resources of gas and
oil and, thus, experience intensive mechanical impacts. By the mid-1990s, off-road
transportation connected with geological prospecting had already resulted in severe
damage of parts of the Y amal Peninsula. Y amal ecosystems are characterised by extreme
vulnerability and low restoration potential. The rate and patterns of their natural recovery
depend on the severity of the disturbance, latitudinal position and habitat type. Though
only 4.5% of the local flora species in surroundings of Bovanenkovo gas field (central
Yamal) can be considered as active colonizers, natural recovery is conducted only by
aboriginal species. Adventitious element, wh ich is common at disturbed sites in the
Boreal zone, was not found. The main problem of recultivation in the northern parts of
Y amal is the absence of appropriate seed material. The planted seeds of southern grasses
get completely extinct after 1 or 2 winters. Only local species (Deschampsia glauca, Poa
alpigena, Arctagrostis latifolia, Calamagrostis neglecta) should be used. The study of
natural recovery has showed that recommended sets of species should be site specific.
Along with grasses, sowing mixtures should include sedges and forbs (different sets for
sandy and loam soils). Transplanting seedlings or vegetatively reproduced young plants
(especially for sedges) give good survival results. Use of willow cuttings is very
promising but appropriate species (Salix lanata, S. reptans) should be chosen.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arctic Flora of the USSR. I-X. 1960-1987. M.-L.: Nauka.

Afonina, O.M. & Chernjadieva, I.V. 1995. Mosses of the Russian Arctic: checklist and bibliography.Arctoa 5:99-142.

Arefiev, S. P. I 994. Estimation of the state of shrubbt plants in tundras in the regions of gas condensate deposits in the Middle Yamal. In: The Development of the North and Problems of Recultivation. Proceedings of the II International conference: Syktyvkar, 2528 April, 1994. Syktyvkar. P. 117-122. (In Russian)

Chapin, F.S.III and Shaver, G.R. 1985. Individualistic growth response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology 66: 564-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940405

Crawford, R. M. M., ed. Disturbance and recovery in Arctic lands: en ecological perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. 620 p.

Dobrinskii, L. N., ed. 1995. The nature of Yamal. Ekaterinburg: Nauka. 435 p. (In Russian)

Forbes, B. C. Reindeer herding and petroleum development on Poluostrov Yamal: sustainable or mutually incompatible uses? Polar Record. 35 (195): 317-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400015667

Khitun, O. 1997. Self-recovery after technogenic and natural disturbances in the central part of the Yamal peninsula (Western Siberian Arctic). In: Crawford, R. M. M., ed. Disturbance and recovery in Arctic lands: en ecological perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press: 53 1-562.

Khitun, O. V.; Rebristaya O. V. 1997. The specific of the compound of species colonizing disturbed habitats in Central Yamal. In: Development of the North and Problems of Recultivation. Proceedings of the III International Conference, 27-3 1 May 1996, SaintPetersburg. Syktuvkar: Komi Scientific Center. P. 132-138.

Krjuchkov V. V. 1994. Degradation of the environment above Polar Circle. Narodnoekhozjaistvo respubliki Komi 3 (1): 44-53. (In Russian)

Martens, H. E. & Younkin, W.E. 1997. Revegetation trials in Western Siberia: a five year summary. In: Development of the North and Problems of Recultivation. Proceedings of the III International Conference, 27-3 1 May 1996, Saint-Petersburg. Syktuvkar: Komi Scientific Center. P. 354-356. (In English)

Rebristaya, O. V., Khitun, O. V and Chernyadjeva, I. V. 1993. Technogenous disturbances and natural re-establishment of vegetation in the subzone of the northern hypoarctic tundras of the Yamal peninsula. Botanicheskii zhurnal 78 (3): 122-135. (In Russian)

Rebristaya, O. V., Khitun, O. V., Chernyadjeva, I. V. and Leibman M. O. 1995. Dynamics of vegetation on the cryogenic landslides in the central part of Yamal. Botanicheskii zhurnal 80(4): 31-48. (In Russian)

Sisko, R. K.,ed. 1977. Yamalo-Gydanskaya oblast. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat.e310 p. (In Russian)

Ukraintzeva, N.G. 1996. Willow tundras of Yamal as an indicator of salinity of frozen grounds. In: Fundamental research of the Earth's cryosphere in Arctic and Subarctic:

Proceedings of the conference. Puschino. P.e121-122. (In Russian)

Vilchek, G.E. & Bykova, O.Yu. 1992. The origin of regional ecological problems within the Northern Tyumen oblast, Russia. Arctic and Alpine Research 24(2): 99- 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00040851.1992.12002935

Watson, A., Alessa, L., Sproull, J., comps. 2002. Wilderness in the Circumpolar North: searching for compatibility in traditional, ecotourism, and ecological values; 2001 May 15-16; Anchorage, AK. Proceedings RMRS-P-26. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 143 p.

Yurtsev, B. A. 1994. Floristic division of the Arctic. Journal of Vegetation Science. 5: 765-776. DOI.: https://doi.org/10.2307/3236191

Zvereva, T.S. 1997. Resilience of soil-plant cover of Yamal tundra under mechanical stress and evaluation of its revegetation ability. In: Kuznetsova, E.G. , ed. Development of the North and Problems of Recultivation. Proceedings of the III International Conference, 27-31 May 1996, Saint-Petersburg. Syktuvkar: Komi Scientific Center: 198202.(In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2019-05-08