Biodegradation of anionic surfactants in the bioremediation of oil-polluted soil

##submission.downloads##

Författare

  • Aare Selberg University of Tartu, Estonia
  • Jana Budashova University of Tartu, Estonia
  • Kalev Uiga University of Tartu, Estonia
  • Toomas Tenno University of Tartu, Estonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/Eco-Tech.2005.041

Nyckelord:

Anionic surfactants; Column tests; Leaching; Petroleum hydrocarbons; Respirometry; Bioremediation

Abstract

Surfactants are applied as emulsifiers or solubilizers by treatment of polluted soil. The
problem of secondary pollution has arisen as result of the surfactant-enhanced remediation of
a polluted soil contaminated with hydrophobic organic compounds. Several studies have
shown that the surfactants are biodegradable in aerobic conditions and the biodegradability
depended on the chemical properties and concentration of surfactant. A study of the leaching
of surfactants from the soil is important, as it is difficult to identify the reason for the
reduction of concentration of pollutants in the soil: is it degradation or leaching? The
experiments were carried out with a fine sandy soil in column tests and CaCO3 was added to
increase soil pH. The soil was treated twice with the bioremediation agent SR-100. The soil
pH, the concentrations of anionic surfactant and petroleum hydrocarbons at the different
depths of soil were determined. The microbial activity of soil fractions was evaluated by
respirometer. The concentration of surfactants was determined colorimetrically as Methylene
Blue active substances (MBAS). The concentration of anionic surfactants decreased in the
upper layer of the columns, but it increased in the lower layers. It indicated the leaching of
the anionic surfactants from soil during experiments of 60 days. The amounts of residual
surfactants were lower in the samples of polluted soil in comparison with unpolluted soil. The
samples of lower soil fractions had higher microbial activity in comparison with upper
fractions. Soil pH was measured as pHH20, pHKcl and pHcac12 instead of the pH of soil
solution, because soil was too dry. The pH of fine sandy soil was 5.8 and during the
experiment the value of pH increased in the lower layer of soil till pHH20 = 7.5.

Statistik

Laddar statistik...

Referenser

Roch, F., Alexander, M., 1995. Biodegradation of hydrophobic compounds in the presence of surfactants. Enviro nmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14(7), 1151-1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620140705

Rouse, J.D., Sabatini, D.A., Sufliata, J.M., Harwell, J.H., 1994. Influence of Surfactants on Microbial Degradation of Organic Compounds. Crit. Rev. Enviro n. Sci. Technol. 24(4), 325-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389409388471

Cserhati; T., Forgacs, E., Oros, G., 2002. Biological activity and environmental impact of anionic surfactants. Environ. Int. 28(5), 337-348.

Scott, M.J., Jones, M.N., 2000. The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1508, 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4157(00)00013-7

Al-Sabagh, A.M., Ahmed, N.S., Nassar, A.M., Gabr, M.M., 2003. Synthesis and evaluation of some polymeric surfactants for treating crude oil emulsions. Part I: treatment of sandy soil polluted with crude oil by monomeric and polymeric surfactants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 216, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00493-4

Suchanek, M., Kostal, J., Demnerova,K., Kralova, B., 2000. Use of sodium dodecylsulphate for stimulation of biodegradation of n-alkanes without residual contamination by the surfactant. Internatio nal Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 45, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00041-X

Wang, S., Mulligan, C.N., 2004. An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil. Chemosphere 57, 1079- 1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.019

Mulligan, C.N., Yong, R.N., Gibbs, B.F., 2001. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil : a review. Engineering Geology 60, 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00117-4

Kosaric, N., 2001. Biosurfactants and Their application for Soil Bioremediation. Food Technol. Biotechnol 39(4), 295-304.

Ron, E.Z., Rosenberg, E., 2002. Biosurfactants and oil bioremediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 13, 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00316-6

Hua, Z., Chen, J., Lun, S., Wang, X., 2003. Influence of biosurfactants produced by Candida Antarctica on surface properties of microorganism and biodegradation of nalkanes. Wat. Res. 37, 4143-4150.

Salanitro, J.P., Diaz, L.A., 1995. Anaerobic biodegradability testing of surfactants. Chemoasphere 30(5), 813-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(94)00443-X

Salanitro, J.P., Diaz, LA, Kravetz, L., 1995. Aerobic biodegradability of surfactants at low concentrations using an automated pressure transducer system. Chemosphere 31 (3), 2827-2837, https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(95)00147-Z

Abd-Allah, A.M.A., Srorr, T., 1998. Biodegradation of anionic surfactants in the presence of organic contaminants. Wat. Res. 3 2(3), 944-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00223-6

Zhang, C., Valsaraj , K.T., Constant, W .D., Roy, D., 1999. Aerobic biodegradation kinetics of four anionic and nonionic surfactants at sub- and supra-critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). Wat. Res. 33 (1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00170-5

Klichler, T., Schnaak, W., 1997. Behavior of linear alkylbenzene sulphonates (LAS) in sandy soils with low amount of organic matter. Chemosphere 35, 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00147-1

SR-I 00 Series. Emulsifying Soil Remediation Agent and Structured Deactivation Technology. Technical Bulletin. Ecology Tech of California.

Koga, M., Yamamichi, Y., Nomoto, Y. et al ., 1999. Rapid determination of anionic surfactants by improved spectrophotometric method using Methylene Blue. Analyrical Sciences 15, 563 -568. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.15.563

Hayashi, K., 1975. A Rapid determination of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate with Methylene Blue. A nal. Biochem. 67, 503-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(75)90324-3

N-Hexane Extractable Material (HEM) and Silica Gel Treated N-Hexane Extractable Material (SGT-HEM) by Extraction and Gravimetry (Oil and Grease and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons). USEPA Method 1664. EPA-821-B-94-004b

Aitken, R.L., Moody, P.W., 1991. Interrelations between Soil pH Measurements in Various Electrolytes and Soil Solution pH in Acidic Soils. A usr. J. Soil Res. 29, 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910483

Vorobyova, L.A., 1998. Chemical analysis of soils: Textbook. Moscow University Press, Moscow, Russia.

Selberg, A., Tenno, T., 2003. Evaluation of bioremediation of oil-polluted soil using the respirometric OxiTop® method. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Establisment of Cooperation between companies and institutions in the Nordic Countries and the Countries in the Baltic Sea Region. Kalmar, Sweden, November 25- 27, 2003, 47-54 https://doi.org/10.15626/Eco-Tech.2003.006

##submission.downloads##

Publicerad

2019-10-17