Reimagining Consumer Psychology through Open Science Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2024.4164Keywords:
Consumer Psychology, research integrity, publication ethics, Open Science principlesAbstract
Consumer psychology is facing various challenges, including a lack of research integrity and unethical publishing practices. This commentary lists pivotal events and discusses related findings that point to the field's need for reform. Open Science principles are proposed as a transformative solution to promote transparency in data, methodology, access, and peer review. Consumer psychology can only be revitalized and regain credibility if it fully embraces these four pillars. Academic and professional associations with an impact on consumer psychology must set a good example by cultivating a culture of integrity and accountability in research and publishing. Consumer psychologists must educate future generations of researchers on research methodology and research ethics.
Metrics
References
Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(3), 407. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021524
Briker, R., & Gerpott, F. H. (2024). Publishing registered reports in management and applied psychology: Common beliefs and best practices. Organizational Research Methods, 27(4), 588–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231210309
Deer, L., Adler, S. J., Datta, H., Mizik, N., & Sarstedt, M. (2024). Toward open science in marketing research (tech. rep.). Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/f7a8c
Dougherty, M. R., & Horne, Z. (2022). Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences. Royal Society Open Science, 9(8), 220334. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220334
Eisend, M., Pol, G., Niewiadomska, D., Riley, J., & Wedgeworth, R. (2024). How much have we learned about consumer research? a meta-
meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad062
Francis, G., & Thunell, E. (2019). Excess success in “ray of hope: Hopelessness increases preferences for brighter lighting”. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.213
Hickman, C. F., Fong, E. A., Wilhite, A. W., & Lee, Y. (2019). Academic misconduct and criminal liability: Manipulating academic journal impact factors. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz019
Hoyer, W. D., Wan, E. W., & Wilcox, K. (2024). Practical relevance in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae023
Jacoby, J. (1976). Consumer psychology: An octennium. Annual review of psychology, 27(1), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.27.020176.001555
Krefeld-Schwalb, A., & Scheibehenne, B. (2023). Tighter nets for smaller fishes? mapping the development of statistical practices in consumer research between 2008 and 2020. Marketing Letters, 34(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09662-3
Labroo, A. A., Mizik, N., & Winer, R. (2022). Introducing marketing letters’ data policy. Marketing letters, 33(3), 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09644-5
Labroo, A. A., Mizik, N., Winer, R. S., Bradlow, E., Huber, J., Lehmann, D., Lynch, J., & Lehmann, D. (2022). Marketing letters encourages submissions to replication corner. Marketing Letters, 33(4), 543–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09653-4
LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2019). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843
Malter, M. S., Holbrook, M. B., Kahn, B. E., Parker, J. R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2020). The past, present, and future of consumer research. Marketing Letters, 31, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09526-8
Mick, D. G. (2001). Announcing a new section in jcr: Reinquiries. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), iii–vii. https://doi.org/10.1086/321955
Moussa, S. (2021). Are FT50 journals really leading? A comment on Fassin. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9613–9622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04158-9
Moussa, S. (2022). Celebrating failure: Learning lessons from a leading consumer behavior journal’s retractions. Consumer Behavior Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2022.254032
Moussa, S. (2023). Issues about marketing journals’ special issues. Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, 1(1), 160–170. http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2022/ETIMM_V01_2022_45.pdf
Moussa, S., & Charlton, A. (2024). Retraction (mal) practices of elite marketing and social psychology journals in the dirk smeesters’ research misconduct case. Accountability in Research, 31(7), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2164489
Peterson, R. A., & Umesh, U. (2018). On the significance of statistically insignificant results in consumer behavior experiments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0528-7
Pham, M. T. (2013). The seven sins of consumer psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.004
Pham, M. T. (2023). Are scientific practices improving in consumer research? a glass half-full and half-empty. Marketing Letters, 34(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09679-2
Pham, M. T., Lee, L., & Stephen, A. T. (2012). Feeling the future: The emotional oracle effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/663823
Pham, M. T., Wu, A. Y., & Wang, D. (2024). Benchmarking scholarship in consumer research: The p-index of thought leadership. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae009
Pruschak, G., Briker, R., Bastardoz, N., Hopp, C., Rose, S., & Timming, A. (2022). How to conduct and publish open science in management research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 17451. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.17451symposium
Schimmack, U. (2021). If consumer psychology wants to be a science it has to behave like a science. https://replicationindex.com/2021/02/21/if-consumer-psychology-wants-to-be-a-science-it-has-to-behave-like-a-science/
Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Preregistration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208
Simonsohn, U. (2023). Preregistration prevalence. https://datacolada.org/115
Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science, 335(6068), 542–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212540
Ziliak, S. T. (2016). Statistical significance and scientific misconduct: Improving the style of the published research paper. Review of Social economy, 74(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2016.1150730
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salim Moussa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
