Thinking Beyond RVCN: Addressing the Complexity of Replication Target Selection

Downloads

Authors

  • Merle-Marie Pittelkow QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Sarahanne M. Field
  • Don van Ravenzwaaij

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2024.4323

Keywords:

replication target selection, qualitative frameworks

Abstract

Isager, van ’t Veer and Lakens (2025) proposed a quantitative operationalization of replication value (denoted RVCN), using average yearly citation count and sample size as proxies for value and uncertainty, respectively. In this commentary, we suggest that the approach of Isager et al., while a good theoretical departure point, oversimplifies the complex decision-making process that underpins replication target selection in practice. We present what we view as some issues with RVCN, notably the use of citation count and ambiguity as to whether RVCN is prescriptive or descriptive. We also present preliminary empirical evidence that RVCN diverges on its performance as a replication target selection method, compared with existing selection methods (such as those published by us in the past). We conclude with the recommendation that going forward, approaches should emphasize the multifaceted nature of replication target selection to maximize their practical utility. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Field, S. M., Hoekstra, R., Bringmann, L., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2019). When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3? Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.218

Isager, P. M., van’t Veer, A. E., & Lakens, D. (2025). Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size. Meta-Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3300

Patience, G. S., Patience, C. A., Blais, B., & Bertrand, F. (2017). Citation analysis of scientific categories. Heliyon, 3(5), e00300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00300

Pittelkow, M.-M., Field, S. M., Isager, P. M., van’t Veer, A. E., Anderson, T., Cole, S. N., Dominik, T., Giner-Sorolla, R., Gok, S., Heyman, T., Jekel, M., Luke, T. J., Mitchell, D. B., Peels, R., Pendrous, R., Sarrazin, S., Schauer, J. M., Specker, E., Tran, U. S., . . . van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2023). The process of replication target selection in psychology: What to consider? [Publisher: Royal Society]. Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), 210586. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210586

Pittelkow, M.-M., Hoekstra, R., Karsten, J., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2021). Replication target selection in clinical psychology: A Bayesian and qualitative reevaluation. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 28(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/CPS0000013

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

Issue

Section

Special Topic