Care according to age: A case of ageism or a conflict on needs?
Despite a strong emphasis that individual support services should be provided according to needs, the Swedish welfare system often use age to organize support. A change in the Social Service Act in 2018 allows municipalities to provide home care for people above a decided age without individual any assessment of needs. Political parties and pensioners’ organizations’ have proposed for the introduction of a nursing home guarantee that assure that people over 85, regardless of needs, have the statutory right to move to a nursing home.
Within the field of critical gerontology, age-based categorizations are widely acknowledged as forms of ageism and a nursing home guarantee could be criticized for communicating that people above the age of 85 are a dependent category that belong in nursing homes. But what are older people’s own views on such age-based arrangements?
Based on eleven peer-group interviews with 27 older people, the aim of this paper is to investigate reasoning on age-based eligibility. Guided by Bradshaw’s typology on needs, the analysis revealed a controversy concerning both the meaning of needs and the meaning of age. A conclusion is that while professionals and gerontologist may dismiss a nursing home guarantee as a case of ageism, older people perceived this as a means to strengthen their rights. A nursing home guarantee was portrayed as a way of tackling ageism in a system that fails to meet the needs of older people by denying them access to care.
Copyright (c) 2022 Håkan Jönsson, Elisabeth Carlstedt, Tove Harnett
Det här verket är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande 4.0 Internationell-licens.