Entrepreneurship through Thomas Mann: Ideas on what entrepreneurship was, is, and is not

Martin Holgersson

doi:10.15626/ace.240104

Downloads

pdf

Authors

Martin Holgersson School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-0490

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/ace.240104

Keywords:

Buddenbrooks, Entrepreneurship, Literature, The Magic Mountain, Thomas Mann

Abstract

Through the writings of Thomas Mann, this paper explores ideas about what entrepreneurship was, is, and is not. The starting point is the question of how the discourse on entrepreneurship has evolved over time. The methodology is inspired by a research program that emphasizes the relationship between social science and literature, and the empirical inquiry is guided by the works of the German author Thomas Mann, particularly, Buddenbrooks and The Magic Mountain. Through these works, the discourse on entrepreneurship is explored at two points in time: one in the 19th century and one in the present day. This exploration illustrates the contrast between the 19th-century perception of the entrepreneur as a capitalist and risk-taker, and the contemporary discourse where the entrepreneur is often seen as a creative and flexible innovator. The final section of the paper delves into the ever-expanding discourse on entrepreneurship and elaborates on what entrepreneurship is not, as well as whether the broad discourse – where even artists are considered entrepreneurs – risks obscuring the understanding of entrepreneurship.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alvesson, M., & Gabriel, Y. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 245-263.

Berglund, K., & Johansson, A. W. (2007). Constructions of entrepreneurship: a discourse analysis of academic publications. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(1), 77-102.

Bjerke, B. (2013). About entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bögenhold, D. (2020). Self-employment and entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive or destructive? In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against Entrepreneurship: a critical examination (pp. 19-35). Palgrave Macmillan.

Calås, D. (2023). “Don’t sow, grow offshoots!”: Proposing a rhizomatic agenda for research in the intersection of arts, culture, and entrepreneurship. Art, Culture & Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 7-29.

Czarniawska, B. (2009). Distant readings: Anthropology of organizations through novels. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(4), 357-372.

Czarniawska, B. (2012). Accounting and detective stories: an excursion to the USA in the 1940s. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(4), 659-672.

Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & De Monthoux, P. G. (Eds.). (1994). Good novels, better management: Reading organizational realities. Psychology Press.

De Geer, H. (Ed.) (1994). Skapare, skojare och skurkar: företagaren i litteratur, film och konst. Timbro.

Edling, C. R., & Rydgren, J. (Eds.). (2011). Sociological insights of great thinkers: Sociology through literature, philosophy, and science. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Ericsson, D. (2010). Constellations of Another other: The case of Aquarian nation. In F. Bill, B. Bjerke & A. W. Johansson (Eds.), De-mobilizing the entrepreneurship discourse. Exploring entrepreneurial thinking and action (pp. 179-197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ericsson, D. (2020). Notes on a fetishist war machine. In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against Entrepreneurship: a critical examination (pp. 37-55). Palgrave Macmillan.

Evans, L., & Fraser, I. (2012). The accountant’s social background and stereotype in popular culture: The novels of Alexander Clark Smith. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(6), 964-1000.

Goncharov, I. A. (1954). Oblomov. Penguin.

Hjorth, D. (2003). Rewriting entrepreneurship: For a new perspective on organisational creativity. Liber.

Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (2016). It’s entrepreneurship, not enterprise: Ai Weiwei as entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 50-54.

Holgersson, M. (2020) Om lugnet i stormen. In J. Alvehus & Ericsson, D. (Eds.), Om undran inför företagsekonomin. Santérus förlag.

Holgersson, M. (2024). Johan Asplunds sociologi: Formen i fokus. Sociologisk forskning, 61(1), 41-64.

Holt, R., & Zundel, M. (2018). Using fiction in organization and management research. In A. Bryman & D. A. Buchanan (Eds.), Unconventional methodology in organization and management research (pp. 45-63). Oxford University Press.

Hägg, G. (1994) Bilder av företagaren i nyare svensk skönlitteratur. In H. De Geer (Ed.), Skapare, skojare och skurkar: företagaren i litteratur, film och konst (pp. 93-109). Timbro.

Johannisson, B. (2005). Entreprenörskapets väsen. Studentlitteratur.

Landström, H. (1999). The roots of entrepreneurship research. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 9.

Landstrom, H., Parhankangas, A., Fayolle, A., & Riot, P. (Eds.). (2016). Challenging entrepreneurship research. Routledge.

Levander, H. (1995). Thomas Mann och hans tid. Carlssons.

Mahieu, R. (2006). Agents of change and policies of scale: a policy study of entrepreneurship and enterprise in education. Umeå University Press.

Mann, T. (1996). Buddenbrooks. Vintage.

Mann, T. (2018). The magic mountain. Random House.

Murtola, A. M. (2020). Entrepreneurship ad absurdum. In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against entrepreneurship: A critical examination. Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 93-110).

Nordqvist, M., & Gartner, W. B. (2020). Literature, fiction, and the family business. Family Business Review, 33(2), 122-129.

Ogbor, J. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology‐critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605-635.

Olaison, L. (2014). Entrepreneurship at the limits. Copenhagen Business School.

Parker, R. H., & Meehan, M. (1999). Accounting in Chaucer’s canterbury tales. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(1), 92-112.

Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. D. (2005). Writing responsibly: Narrative fiction and organization studies. Organization, 12(4), 467-491.

Ramoglou, S., Gartner, W. B., & Tsang, E. W. (2020). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is (still) the wrong question. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13.

Savage, P., Cornelissen, J.P., & Franck, H. (2018). Fiction and organization studies. Organization studies, 39(7), 975-994.

Spicer, A. (2012). Critical theories of entrepreneurship. In K. Mole and R. Monder (Eds), Perspectives in Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan.

Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 16(3), 179-196.

Tedmanson, D., Verduyn, K., Essers, C., & Gartner, W. B. (2012). Critical perspectives in entrepreneurship research. Organization, 19(5), 531-541.

Wessell, E. (2004). Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain and his war essays. In H. Lehnert & E. Wessell (Eds.). A Companion to the Works of Thomas Mann. Boydell & Brewer.

Örtenblad, A. (Ed.). Against entrepreneurship: A critical examination. Palgrave Macmillan.