Entrepreneurship through Thomas Mann
Ideas on what entrepreneurship was, is, and is not
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15626/ace.240104Keywords:
Buddenbrooks, Entrepreneurship, Literature, The Magic Mountain, Thomas MannAbstract
Through the writings of Thomas Mann, this paper explores ideas about what entrepreneurship was, is, and is not. The starting point is the question of how the discourse on entrepreneurship has evolved over time. The methodology is inspired by a research program that emphasizes the relationship between social science and literature, and the empirical inquiry is guided by the works of the German author Thomas Mann, particularly, Buddenbrooks and The Magic Mountain. Through these works, the discourse on entrepreneurship is explored at two points in time: one in the 19th century and one in the present day. This exploration illustrates the contrast between the 19th-century perception of the entrepreneur as a capitalist and risk-taker, and the contemporary discourse where the entrepreneur is often seen as a creative and flexible innovator. The final section of the paper delves into the ever-expanding discourse on entrepreneurship and elaborates on what entrepreneurship is not, as well as whether the broad discourse – where even artists are considered entrepreneurs – risks obscuring the understanding of entrepreneurship.
Metrics
References
Alvesson, M., & Gabriel, Y. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 245-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0327
Berglund, K., & Johansson, A. W. (2007). Constructions of entrepreneurship: a discourse analysis of academic publications. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(1), 77-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200710736276
Bjerke, B. (2013). About entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bögenhold, D. (2020). Self-employment and entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive or destructive? In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against Entrepreneurship: a critical examination (pp. 19-35). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47937-4_2
Calås, D. (2023). “Don’t sow, grow offshoots!”: Proposing a rhizomatic agenda for research in the intersection of arts, culture, and entrepreneurship. Art, Culture & Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 7-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15626/ace.230102
Czarniawska, B. (2009). Distant readings: Anthropology of organizations through novels. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(4), 357-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910967143
Czarniawska, B. (2012). Accounting and detective stories: an excursion to the USA in the 1940s. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(4), 659-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211225088
Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & De Monthoux, P. G. (Eds.). (1994). Good novels, better management: Reading organizational realities. Psychology Press.
De Geer, H. (Ed.) (1994). Skapare, skojare och skurkar: företagaren i litteratur, film och konst. Timbro.
Edling, C. R., & Rydgren, J. (Eds.). (2011). Sociological insights of great thinkers: Sociology through literature, philosophy, and science. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216016236
Ericsson, D. (2010). Constellations of Another other: The case of Aquarian nation. In F. Bill, B. Bjerke & A. W. Johansson (Eds.), De-mobilizing the entrepreneurship discourse. Exploring entrepreneurial thinking and action (pp. 179-197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806459.00019
Ericsson, D. (2020). Notes on a fetishist war machine. In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against Entrepreneurship: a critical examination (pp. 37-55). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47937-4_3
Evans, L., & Fraser, I. (2012). The accountant’s social background and stereotype in popular culture: The novels of Alexander Clark Smith. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(6), 964-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211250215
Goncharov, I. A. (1954). Oblomov. Penguin.
Hjorth, D. (2003). Rewriting entrepreneurship: For a new perspective on organisational creativity. Liber.
Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (2016). It’s entrepreneurship, not enterprise: Ai Weiwei as entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 50-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.03.001
Holgersson, M. (2020) Om lugnet i stormen. In J. Alvehus & Ericsson, D. (Eds.), Om undran inför företagsekonomin. Santérus förlag.
Holgersson, M. (2024). Johan Asplunds sociologi: Formen i fokus. Sociologisk forskning, 61(1), 41-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.61.25559
Holt, R., & Zundel, M. (2018). Using fiction in organization and management research. In A. Bryman & D. A. Buchanan (Eds.), Unconventional methodology in organization and management research (pp. 45-63). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796978.003.0003
Hägg, G. (1994) Bilder av företagaren i nyare svensk skönlitteratur. In H. De Geer (Ed.), Skapare, skojare och skurkar: företagaren i litteratur, film och konst (pp. 93-109). Timbro.
Johannisson, B. (2005). Entreprenörskapets väsen. Studentlitteratur.
Landström, H. (1999). The roots of entrepreneurship research. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-02-02-1999-B002
Landstrom, H., Parhankangas, A., Fayolle, A., & Riot, P. (Eds.). (2016). Challenging entrepreneurship research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685915
Levander, H. (1995). Thomas Mann och hans tid. Carlssons.
Mahieu, R. (2006). Agents of change and policies of scale: a policy study of entrepreneurship and enterprise in education. Umeå University Press.
Mann, T. (1996). Buddenbrooks. Vintage.
Mann, T. (2018). The magic mountain. Random House.
Murtola, A. M. (2020). Entrepreneurship ad absurdum. In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against entrepreneurship: A critical examination. Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 93-110). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47937-4_6
Nordqvist, M., & Gartner, W. B. (2020). Literature, fiction, and the family business. Family Business Review, 33(2), 122-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520924856
Ogbor, J. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology‐critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00196
Olaison, L. (2014). Entrepreneurship at the limits. Copenhagen Business School.
Parker, R. H., & Meehan, M. (1999). Accounting in Chaucer’s canterbury tales. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(1), 92-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910260012
Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. D. (2005). Writing responsibly: Narrative fiction and organization studies. Organization, 12(4), 467-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405052757
Ramoglou, S., Gartner, W. B., & Tsang, E. W. (2020). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is (still) the wrong question. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00168
Savage, P., Cornelissen, J.P., & Franck, H. (2018). Fiction and organization studies. Organization studies, 39(7), 975-994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617709309
Spicer, A. (2012). Critical theories of entrepreneurship. In K. Mole and R. Monder (Eds), Perspectives in Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35809-6_11
Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 16(3), 179-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0898562042000197135
Tedmanson, D., Verduyn, K., Essers, C., & Gartner, W. B. (2012). Critical perspectives in entrepreneurship research. Organization, 19(5), 531-541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412458495
Wessell, E. (2004). Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain and his war essays. In H. Lehnert & E. Wessell (Eds.). A Companion to the Works of Thomas Mann. Boydell & Brewer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781571136398-010
Örtenblad, A. (Ed.). Against entrepreneurship: A critical examination. Palgrave Macmillan.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Martin Holgersson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.