Feelgood literature: Entrepreneurial Robinsonades for the 21st century woman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15626/ace.240102Keywords:
Coșgel, Defoe, Economy of homecoming, Entrepreneurial narrative, Feelgood literature, Robinson Crusoe, Socio-economic imaginaryAbstract
This article explores the intersection of entrepreneurship and feelgood literature, addressing Coșgel's argument about the impact of metaphors and narratives in shaping economic theories and the role of the entrepreneur. In entrepreneurial studies, there has been limited examination of how literary narratives influence entrepreneurial conceptualization. Analyzing feelgood literature can challenge male-coded entrepreneurial roles and offer alternative perspectives on women's entrepreneurship.
Feelgood literature echoes themes from Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, and the study argues that feelgood literature serves as entrepreneurial Robinsonades for modern women, offering socio-economic commentary on their attitudes towards work. The genre both repeats and rewrites the Robinson narrative, thereby reshaping the male-coded entrepreneurial narrative.
The article concludes that feelgood literature represents a new type of entrepreneurial imaginary, sharing features with what Dahl and Helin call an “economy of homecoming”, in which local community and caring supersede the individualistic and expansive/exploitative economy of the Robinson-type entrepreneur.
Metrics
References
Ahl, H. J. (2002). The making of the female entrepreneur: A discourse analysis of research texts on women’s entrepreneurship. Jönköping International Business School.
Benfares, R. (2023). Reading Defoe today Robinson Crusoe: An inspiring entrepreneur. The International Journal of Applied Language Studies and Culture, 6(2), 1-21.
Blaim, A. (2016). Robinson Crusoe and his doubles. The English Robinsonade of the eighteenth century. Peter Lang Edition.
Bornstein, D., & Davis, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Gender and entrepreneurship: An ethnographic Approach. Routledge.
Cohen, L., & Duberley, J. (2021). Making sense of our working lives: The concept of the career imagination. Organization Theory, 2, 1-15.
Colgan, J. (2014). Little Beach Street Bakery. Sphere.
Colgan, J. (2016). The bookshop on the corner. William Morrow.
Coşgel, M. M. (1996). Metaphors, stories, and the entrepreneur in economics. History of Political Economy, 28(1), 57-76.
Dahl, M., Helin, J., & Ubbe, E. (2023). Hemkomstens ekonomi: Företagande bortom erövring. Studentlitteratur.
Dawson, T. (2008). The discovery of the personal unconscious: Robinson Crusoe and modern Identity. In S. Rowland (Ed.), Psyche and the arts: Jungian approaches to music, architecture, literature, film and painting (pp. 25-34). Routledge.
Ferriss, S., & Young, M. (2006). Chick lit: The new woman’s fiction. Routledge.
Fielding, H. (1996). Bridget Jones's diary. Picador.
Fisher, C. (2018). Innovation and imitation in the eighteenth-century Robinsonade. In J. Richetti (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to “Robinson Crusoe” (pp. 99-111). Cambridge University Press.
García, M.-C. D., & Welter, F. (2011). Gender identities and practices: Interpreting women entrepreneurs’ narratives. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 384-404.
Gartner, W. B. (2007). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 613-627.
Gosling, S. (2021). The house beneath the cliffs. Simon & Schuster.
Grapard, U. (2011). Robinson Crusoe: The quintessential economic man? In U. Grapard & G. Hewitson (Eds.), Robinson Crusoe's economic man: A construction and deconstruction (pp. 93-110). Routledge. https://doi-org.proxy.lnu.se/10.4324/9780203808214
Green, M. (1989). The Robinson Crusoe story. In J. Richards (Ed.), Imperialism and juvenile literature (pp. 34-52). Manchester University Press.
Green, M. (1990). The Robinson Crusoe story. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hamberg, E. (2021). Je m'appelle Agneta. Piratförlaget.
Hamilton, E. (2013). The discourse of entrepreneurial masculinities (and femininities). Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(1-2), 90-99.
Hewitson, G. (2011). Robinson Crusoe: The paradigmatic “rational economic man”. In U. Grapard & G. Hewitson (Eds.), Robinson Crusoe's economic man: A construction and deconstruction (pp. 111-132). Routledge.
Horwitz, S., & Skwire, S. (2020). Crusoe and the economists: An accounting. The Independent Review, 25(3), 345-356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48617493
Johansson, A. W. (2004). Narrating the entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 273-293.
Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Alertness, luck and entrepreneurial profit. In I. M. Kirzner (Ed.), Perception, opportunity, and profit: Studies in theory of entrepreneurship (pp. 154-181). The University of Chicago Press.
Klingberg, E. (2017). Manglade dukar och vikta servetter. Historiska Media.
Kłosiński, M. (2021). Robinson Crusoe and his digital doubles. In A. S. Kowalczyk & J. L. Galant (Eds.), Opalescent worlds. Studies in utopia. Festschrift in honour of Artur Blaim (pp. 221-238). Maria Curie-Skłodowska University.
Krapu-Kallio, S. (2017). Westins bageri & kafé. Storytel Pocket.
Lavoie, D. (1991). The discovery and interpretation of profit opportunities: Culture and the Kirznerian entrepreneur. In B. Berger (Ed.), The culture of entrepreneurship (pp. 33-51). ICS Press.
Lewis, P. (2006). The quest for invisibility: Female entrepreneurs and the masculine norm of entrepreneurship. Gender, Work & Organization, 13(5), 453-469. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00317.x
McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. University of Wisconsin Press.
Nilson, M. (2008). Chick lit: Från glamour till vardagsrealism. BTJ förlag.
Nilson, M. (2022). Feelgood-litteratur - avgränsningar och tillbakablickar. In M. Nilson & P. K. Posti (Eds.), Speglingar av feelgood: Genre, etikett eller känsla? (pp. 7-26). Linnaeus University Press.
Nilson, M., & Ehriander, H. (2013). Chick lit: Brokiga läsningar och didaktiska utmaningar. Liber.
Nilson, M., & Posti, P. K. (2022). Speglingar av feelgood: Genre, etikett eller känsla? Linnaeus University Press.
Packard, M. D. (2020). Autarkic entrepreneurship. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 23(3/4), 390-426.
Parker, M. (2002). Against management: Organization in the age of managerialism. Polity.
Posti, P. K. (2020). Kärleksaffärer och kvinnliga affärer: Ewa Klingbergs Huskvarnasviten. HumaNetten(45), 435-442.
Posti, P. K. (2022). Feelgood som genre och genrevärld. In M. Nilson & P. K. Posti (Eds.), Speglingar av feelgood. Genre, etikett eller känsla? (pp. 27-67). Linnaeus University Press.
Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press.
Richetti, J. (Ed.). (2018). The Cambridge companion to “Robinson Crusoe”. Cambridge University Press.
Samson, M. (2011). Towards a “Friday” model of international trade: A feminist deconstruction of race and gender bias in the Robinson Crusoe trade allegory. In U. Grapard & G. Hewitson (Eds.), Robinson Crusoe's economic man: A construction and deconstruction (pp. 187-201). Routledge.
Smith, R. (2002). Inspirational tales: Propagating the entrepreneurial narrative amongst children. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 2002. Retrieved December 4, 2024, from http://hdl.handle.net/10059/420
Spearman, D. (1966). The novel and society. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Swain, H. (2020). The winter garden. Simon & Schuster.
Tauchmann, R. L. (2023). Robinson Crusoe – But on Mars: Investigating intertextuality in Andy Weir’s The Martian (2014). Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 71(2), 189-199.
Watt, I. (1967). The rise of the novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Chatto & Windus. (1957)
Wyatt, S. (2004). Danger! Metaphors at work in economics, geophysiology, and the Internet. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(2), 242-261. http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lnu.se/stable/1557981
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Piia Posti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
