Beyond a Dream: The Practical Foundations of Disconnected Psychology

Dario Krpan

doi:10.15626/MP.2020.2740

Authors

Dario Krpan London School of Economics and Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2020.2740

Keywords:

knowledge, ethics, method, research, meta-psychology

Abstract

Disconnected psychology is a form of psychological science in which researchers ground their work upon the main principles of psychological method but are detached from a “field” consisting of other psychologists that comprises connected psychology. It has previously been proposed that combining the two forms of psychology would result in the most significant advancement of psychological knowledge (Krpan, 2020). However, disconnected psychology may seem to be an “abstract utopia”, given that it has not been previously detailed how to put it into practice. The present article therefore sets the practical foundations of disconnected psychology. In this regard, I first describe a hypothetical disconnected psychologist and discuss relevant methodological and epistemological implications. I then propose how this variant of psychology could be integrated with the current academic system (i.e., with connected psychology). Overall, the present article transforms disconnected psychology from a hazy dream into substance that could eventually maximize psychological knowledge, even if implementing it would require a radical transformation of psychological science.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Dorsey.

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950

Anseel, F., Duyck, W., De Baene, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology journals. American Psychologist, 59(1), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.49

Assiter, A. (2017). Transferable skills in higher education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315041605

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Barbour, J. (2001). The end of time: The next revolution in physics. Oxford University Press.

Bartlett, R. (2013). Tolstoy: A Russian life. Profile Books.

Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Perseus.

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., & et al. (2017). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z

Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x06009101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009101

Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope. MIT Press.

Boring, E. G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090793

Bridges, D. (1993). Transferable skills: A philosophical perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 18(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079312331382448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079312331382448

Budge, G. S., & Katz, B. (1995). Constructing psychological knowledge. Theory and Psychology, 5(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395052003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395052003

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.116

Campbell, J. O. (2015). Darwin does physics. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Campbell, J. O. (2016). Universal Darwinism as a process of Bayesian inference. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00049

Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298568

Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. John Wiley.

Csiszar, A., Gingras, Y., Power, M., Wouters, P., Griese-mer, J. R., Kehm, B. M., & et al. (2020). Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. MIT Press.

Cutler, I. (2014). Cynicism from Diogenes to Dilbert. McFarland; Company.

De Rond, M., & Miller, A. N. (2005). Publish or perish. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka: Toward a minor literature. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/468842

Department for Education. (2015). Employment and earnings outcomes of higher education graduates: Experimental statistics using the Longitudinal Education Outcomes (LEO) data: Further breakdowns. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471350/BIS-15-408-Employment-and-earnings-outcomes-of-higher-education-graduates-experimental-statistics.pdf

Department for Education. (2016). Graduate outcomes (LEO): Employment and earnings outcomes of higher education graduates by subject studied and graduate characteristics in 2016/17. [Online] Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/790223/Main_text.pdf

Deutsch, K. W. (1966). On theories, taxonomies, and models as communication codes for organizing information. Behavioral Science, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830110102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830110102

Dickinson, E., & Ward, T. V. W. (1986). The letters of Emily Dickinson. Harvard University Press.

Eidelson, R. J. (1997). Complex adaptive systems in the behavioral and social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 1(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.1.1.42

Emerson, R. W. (1982). Nature and selected essays. Penguin Books.

Extance, A. (2018). How AI technology can tame the scientific literature. Nature, 561(7722), 273–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06617-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06617-5

Fenigstein, A. (2009). Private and public self-consciousness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 495–511). Guilford Press.

Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076760

Feynman, R. P. (1998). Cargo cult science. The Art and Science of Analog Circuit Design, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-075067062-3/50008-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067062-3/50008-X

Fletcher, G. J. O. (1995). The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Erlbaum.

Fortin, J.-M., & Currie, D. J. (2013). Big science vs. little science: How scientific impact scales with funding. PLoS ONE, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065263

Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.

Freud, S. (1962). Civilization and its discontents. W.W. Norton.

Gandhi, M. K. (1997). Hind swaraj and other writings. Cambridge University Press.

Goldman, A. I. (1993). The psychology of folk psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00028648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00028648

Green, C. D. (2017). Publish and perish: Psychology’s most prolific authors are not always the ones we remember. The American Journal of Psychology, 130(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.1.0105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.1.0105

Gutland, C. (2018). Husserlian phenomenology as a kind of introspection. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00896

Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2010). Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology. Psychological Reports, 106(3), 891–900. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.106.3.891-900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.106.3.891-900

Hegarty, P., & Walton, Z. (2012). The consequences of predicting scientific impact in psychology using journal impact factors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429356

Held, L., & Ott, M. (2018). On p-values and bayes factors. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5(1), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100307

Heller, A. (2015). Renaissance man. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682488

Holbrook, M. B. (1997). Romanticism, introspection, and the roots of experiential consumption: Morris the epicurean. Consumption Markets and Culture, 1(2), 97–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.1997.9670295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.1997.9670295

Hong, S.-M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014

Hume, D. (2003). A treatise of human nature. Dover.

Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., & Yee, L. (2017). Delivering through diversity. McKinsey & Company. [Online] Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/people%20and%20organizational%20performance/our%20insights/delivering%20through%20diversity/delivering-through-diversity_full-report.pdf

Huxley, A. (1954). The doors of perception and heaven and hell. Harper & Row.

Ilieva, J., Killingley, P., Tsiligiris, V., & Usher, A. (2019). The shape of global higher education: International comparisons with Europe. British Council. [Online] Available at: https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/k006_02_the_shape_of_global_higher_education_in_europe_final_v5_web.pdf

Janosov, M., Battiston, F., & Sinatra, R. (2020). Success and luck in creative careers. EPJ Data Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00227-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00227-w

Jung, C. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed.) Bollingen.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (2001). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1997). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164061

Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua "science." American Psychologist, 36(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.36.3.257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.36.3.257

Krpan, D. (2020). Unburdening the shoulders of giants: A quest for disconnected academic psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904775

Larson, R. C., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Xue, Y. (2013). Too many PhD graduates or too few academic job openings: The basic reproductive number r0 in academia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(6), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2210

Leible, S., Schlager, S., Schubotz, M., & Gipp, B. (2019). A review on blockchain technology and blockchain projects fostering open science. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016

Levitas, R. (1990). Educated hope: Ernst Bloch on abstract and concrete utopia. Utopian Studies, 1(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/www.jstor.org/stable/i20718993

Lin, Y.-G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(02)00092-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4

Liu, L., Wang, Y., Sinatra, R., Giles, C. L., Song, C., & Wang, D. (2018). Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Nature, 559(7714), 396–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0315-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0315-8

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2005). Goal setting theory: Theory building by induction. In K. G. Smith & M. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 128–150). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0007

Locke, E. A. (2007). The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33(6), 867–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307307636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307307636

Loftus, G. R. (1996). Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(6), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512376

Madigan, R., Johnson, S., & Linton, P. (1995). The language of psychology: Apa style as epistemology. American Psychologist, 50(6), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.50.6.428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.50.6.428

Maltseva, K., & Lutz, C. (2018). A quantum of self: A study of self-quantification and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.006

Manley, R., & Sloan, M. (1997). Self-made worlds: Visionary folk art environments. Aperture.

Maslow, A. H. (1965). Eupsychian management. Richard D. Irwin.

Maul, A., Torres Irribarra, D., & Wilson, M. (2016). On the philosophical foundations of psychological measurement. Measurement, 79, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.001

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1258

Moghaddam, F. M. (1989). Specialization and despecialization in psychology: Divergent processes in the three worlds. International Journal of Psychology, 24(1-5), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.1989.10600036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.1989.10600036

Moghaddam, F. M. (1997). The specialized society: The plight of the individual in an age of individualism. Praeger.

Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089

Morowitz, H. J. (2018). The mind, the brain and complex adaptive systems. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492761

Neel, R., Kenrick, D. T., White, A. E., & Neuberg, S. L. (2016). Individual differences in fundamental social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000068

Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. The Royal Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.52126.39088015628399

Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2012.692215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215

Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393(6685), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/31225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/31225

Pais, A. (1982). ‘Subtle is the Lord. . . ‘: The science and the life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press.

Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G. C., Seifer, T. A., Cruce, T. M., & Blaich, C. F. (2005). Liberal arts colleges and liberal arts education: New evidence on impacts. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(3), 1–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3103

Paulus, F. M., Rademacher, L., Schäfer, T. A., Müller-Pinzler, L., & Krach, S. (2015). Journal impact factor shapes scientists’ reward signal in the prospect of publication. PLOS ONE, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142537

Pier, E. L., Brauer, M., Filut, A., Kaatz, A., Raclaw, J., Nathan, M. J., Ford, C. E., & Carnes, M. (2018). Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(12), 2952–2957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115

Plato. (2007). The republic. Penguin Classics.

Pluchino, A., Biondo, A. E., & Rapisarda, A. (2018). Talent versus luck: The role of randomness in success and failure. Advances in Complex Systems, 21(03n04), 1850014. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525918500145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525918500145

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577

Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3050617

Pronin, E. (2009). The introspection illusion. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 41) (pp. 1–67). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00401-2

Rahula, W. S. (1974). What the Buddha taught. Grove Press.

Rand, A. (1963). For the new intellectual: The philosophy of Ayn Rand. Penguin.

Rauhvargers, A. (2013). Global university rankings and their impact: Report ii. brussels. European University Association. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/global%20university%20rankings%20and%20their%20impact%20-%20report%20ii.pdf

Rich, D. L. (2005). Amelia earhart: A biography. Smithsonian Books.

Roediger, H. L. (2003). Focus on academia: The complete academic. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/focus-on-academia-the-compleat-academic

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.10.1276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.44.10.1276

Roughgarden, T. (2010). Algorithmic game theory. Communications of the ACM, 53(7), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/1785414.1785439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1785414.1785439

Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107493-4

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

Rynasiewicz, R., & Renn, J. (2006). The turning point for Einstein’s annus mirabilis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.12.002

Sabine, G. H. (1917). Philosophical and scientific specialization. The Philosophical Review, 26(1), 16–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2178286

Safer, M. A., & Tang, R. (2009). The psychology of referencing in psychology journal articles. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01104.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01104.x

Sawyer, R. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734892

Segen, J. C. (1992). The dictionary of modern medicine. Parthenon Publishing Group.

Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845

Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239

Skinner, B. (1948). Walden two. Prentice Hall.

Stanford, P. K. (2015). Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: The impact of professionalization, peer-review, and big science. Synthese, 196(10), 3915–3932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0856-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0856-4

Stanley, S. (2012). Intimate distances: William james’ introspection, buddhist mindfulness, and experiential inquiry. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.10.001

Sternberg, R. J. (2017). Psychology 101 1/2: The unspoken rules for success in academia. American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14949-001

Stojmenova Duh, E., Duh, A., Droftina, U., Kos, T., Duh, U., Simoniˇc Korošak, T., & Korošak, D. (2019). Publish-and-flourish: Using blockchain platform to enable cooperative scholarly communication. Publications, 7(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020033

Swan, M. (2012). Sensor mania! the internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 1(3), 217–253. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan1030217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan1030217

Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2012.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2012.0002

Teo, T. (2009). Philosophical concerns in critical psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 36–54). Sage.

Tijdink, J. K., Verbeke, R., & Smulders, Y. M. (2014). Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552421

Trafimow, D. (2009). The theory of reasoned action. Theory and Psychology, 19(4), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309336319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309336319

Trafimow, D. (2012). The role of auxiliary assumptions for the validity of manipulations and measures. Theory and Psychology, 22(4), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311429996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311429996

Trafimow, D. (2014). Considering quantitative and qualitative issues together. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.743202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.743202

Trafimow, D. (2021). A taxonomy of major premises and implications for falsification and verification. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 33(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2021.1964845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2021.1964845

Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.2.284

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

Tshitoyan, V., Dagdelen, J., Weston, L., Dunn, A., Rong, Z., Kononova, O., Persson, K. A., Ceder, G., & Jain, A. (2019). Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature, 571(7763), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1335-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1335-8

Usher, A., Ilieva, J., Killingley, P., & Tsiligiris, V. (2019). The shape of global higher education: The americas. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/k006_03_the_shape_of_global_higher_education_americas_final_web.pdf

Vachelard, J., Gambarra-Soares, T., Augustini, G., Riul, P., & Maracaja-Coutinho, V. (2016). A guide to scientific crowdfunding. PLOS Biology, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002373

Valentinuzzi, M. E., Ortiz, M. H., Cervantes, D., & Leder, R. S. (2016). Nikola tesla: Why was he so much resisted and forgotten? [retrospectroscope]. IEEE Pulse, 7(6), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/mpul.2016.2606472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2016.2606472

Watson, R. (2019). Predatory journals and the pollution of academic publishing. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(2), 223–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12739

Wells, I. B. (2020). Crusade for justice: The autobiography of Ida B. Wells. University of Chicago Press.

Yaden, D. B., Kaufman, S. B., Hyde, E., Chirico, A., Gaggioli, A., Zhang, J. W., & Keltner, D. (2018). The development of the awe experience scale (awes): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484940

Zinsser, J. P. (2007). Emilie du Châtelet: Daring genius of the enlightenment. Penguin.