Group Work and Peer Assessment in Optometry Higher Education.

Authors

  • Fabrizio Zeri University of Milano Bicocca
  • Riccardo Cervio
  • Marta Mosci
  • Silvia Tavazzi
  • Shehzad Naroo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5384/sjovs.vol13i1p10-18

Abstract

In health-related professions, education has unique challenges. Problem-based learning can be extremely useful and driven by strategies such as group-work (GW) and peer assessment (PA), which are both used as formative and assessment tools. This study aimed to explore experience and perceptions about GW and PA held by educators and students in optometry. In a first survey, 45 Italian educators (43.8 ± 13.0 years old) of optometric clinical modules answered an email questionnaire investigating their attitudes towards GW and PA. In a second survey, 66 3rd-year undergraduates (22.5 ± 2.0 years old) answered a questionnaire investigating the perception and attitudes towards GW and PA at the beginning and at the end of a module of Advanced Optometry structured with a formative/summative GW activity with a final PA. Two-thirds of optometry educators declared they use GW, but not as a summative assessment tool. Only a quarter of the sample answered that they used PA at least once. Educators’ attitudes towards GW were more positive than PA (p < 0.001). About 60% and 80% of the interviewed students stated they have never participated in GW and PA, respectively. Students’ pre-course attitudes towards GW and PA resulted in values close to the middle of the scale with no significant differences and positive correlations between them (p < 0.001). When students’ GW attitudes were compared with educators’ GW attitudes, the latter were more positive. Students’ post-course attitudes towards GW and PA were enhanced. Although GW and PA are considered very good strategies to improve teaching, the results of the present study have demonstrated that the use of these strategies in Italian optometric higher education is limited. However, the study has also demonstrated that Italian optometry educators have positive attitudes towards “social” teaching strategies especially for GW. Furthermore, optometry students showed improved attitudes towards these strategies once exposed to them. Overall, the results of the study open the possibility to integrate “social” teaching strategies to improve the effectiveness of optometry education. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barrows, H., & Pickell, G. (1991). Developing Clinical Problem Solving Skills: A Guide to More Effective Diagnosis and Treatment. WW Norton.

Benati, S., & Chiari, G. (2008). I meccanismi dell’apprendimento cooperativo: un approccio di scelta razionale. Dipartimento di sociologia e ricerca sociale quaderni.

Bennett, N., & Dunne, E. (1992). Managing Classroom Groups. Simon & Schuster Education.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1080 / 0260293990240405

Bruffee, K. A. (1995). Sharing Our Toys: Cooperative Learning Versus Collaborative Learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00091383.1995.9937722

Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Liu, N. (2006). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong University Press.

Comoglio, M. (1999). Il cooperative learning. Strategie di sperimentazione. (Ed. Gruppo Abele., Ed.). Ed. Gruppo Abele.

Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A., & Wu, M. (1993). Peer Assessment of an Individual’s Contribution to a Group Project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180104

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self-, Peer and Coassessment in Higher Education: A review. Studies in Higher Education. https: //doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935

Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud &

N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 128–143). Routledge.

Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287

Forsell, J., Forslund Frykedal, K., & Hammar Chiriac, E. (2020). Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level. Small Group Research. https: //doi.org/10.1177/1046496419878269

Freeman, M. (1995). Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293950200305

Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., Kistnasamy, B., Meleis, A., Naylor, D., Pablos-Mendez, A., Reddy, S., Scrimshaw, S., Sepulveda, J., Serwadda, D., & Zurayk, H. (2010). Health professionals for a new century: Ttransforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / S0140 - 6736(10)61854-5

Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2008). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891414

Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2011). Assessment of students’ learning when working in groups. Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881. 2011.598661

Galton, M., & Williamson, J. (1992). Group Work in the Primary Classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392713

Gaudet, A. D., Ramer, L. M., Nakonechny, J., Cragg, J. J., & Ramer, M. S. (2010). Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0015821

Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tate.2009.10.034

Hammar Chiriac, E. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning – students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2014.00558

Hassanien, A. (2006). Student experience of group work and group assessment in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism. https://doi.org/10. 1300/J172v06n01_02

Hrynchak, P. K., & Spafford, M. M. (2015). Optometry Students’ Attitudes about Team-Based Learning (tech. rep.).

Hwong, N. C., Caswell, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning on prospective elementary teachers’ music achievement and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00224545.1993.9712118

Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030902947041

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Leach, L., Neutze, G., & Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and empowerment: Some

critical questions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/

/02602930120063457

Lotti, A. (2015). Problem based learning in Italian universities. Journal on Medical Education and Practice, 15(1), 5-1(1), 5–12.

Lovie-Kitchin, J. (1991). Problem-based learning in optometry. In D. Boud & F. Feletti (Eds.), He challenge of problem-based learning (pp. 203–210). St. Martin’s Press.

Ortiz, A. E., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). The effect of positive goal and resource interdependence on individual performance. Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9713998

Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448443.pdf

Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does It Matter if I Hate Teamwork? What Impacts Student Attitudes toward Teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0273475302250571

Race, P. (2001). A briefing on self, peer and group assessment. LTSN generic centre.

Race, P. (2007). The lecturer’s toolkit: a resource for developing assessment, learning and teaching. Routledge. https : / / doi . org / https : / / doi . org / 10 . 4324 / 9780203968529

Race, P., Brown, S., & Smith, B. (2005). 500 tips on assessment. Routledge. https: //doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203307359

Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- And peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1

Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students ’ future-learning in higher education . Journal of University Teaching Learning Practice.

Walker, A. (2001). British Psychology Students’ Perceptions of Group-Work and Peer Assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat. 2001.1.1.28

Weisinger, H. S., & Prideaux 3, D. (2011). Modernizing Optometric Education in Australia: Ideas from Medical Education. Optometric Education.

White, F., Lloyd, H., & Goldfried, J. (2007). Evaluating student perceptions of group work and group assessment. In A. Brew & J. Sachs (Eds.), Transforming a university: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice (pp. 71–80). Sydney University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-31

How to Cite

Zeri, F., Cervio, R., Mosci, M., Tavazzi, S., & Naroo, S. (2020). Group Work and Peer Assessment in Optometry Higher Education. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 13(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.5384/sjovs.vol13i1p10-18

Issue

Section

Scientific Article