Framework analysis for Vision Scientists: a clear step-by-step guide




Qualitative, Framework Analysis, Methodology, Vision Science


Vision sciences has traditionally been a quantitative discipline. However, to fully capture all aspects of clinical vision care, researchers increasingly need to be conversant in both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. This has resulted in qualitative methodologies becoming more common in vision sciences research literature. From the authors’ perspective, vision researchers often struggle to identify suitable qualitative methodologies when coming from a tradition of a realist ontology, or the view that independent truth exists. This study explores the ontological and epistemological considerations when approaching qualitative research in vision sciences and proposes framework analysis as a qualitative methodology that is accessible for vision scientists. Framework analysis is a flexible and highly utilitarian qualitative analysis method which complements quantitative methodologies. This paper also presents a step-by-step guide for conducting framework analysis in a logical, transparent, and repeatable way that will provide a clear audit trail of how results are obtained from subjective data. This is done using a worked example from a recent eye care study.


Metrics Loading ...


Al-Attas, A. H., Williams, C. D., Pitchforth, E. L., O’Callaghan, C. O., &

Lewallen, S. (2010). Understanding delay in accessing specialist emergency eye care in a developing country: Eye trauma in Tanzania. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 17(2), 103–112. DOI:

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. DOI:

Bahari, S. F. (2012). Qualitative versus quantitative research strategies: Contrasting epistemological and ontological assumptions. Jurnal teknologi. A, Pembuatan, bahan termaju, tenaga dan pengangkutan. DOI:

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI:

Chang, P., Zhang, B., Lin, L., Chen, R., Chen, S., Zhao, Y., & Qu, J. (2021). Comparison of myopic progression before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown. Ophthalmology, 128(11), 1655–1657. DOI:

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 215824401452263. DOI:

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. DOI:

Ferreira, A., Marta, A., Baptista, P. M., Caiado, F., Abreu, A. C., Maia, S., Miranda, V., Pinto, M. C., Parreira, R., & Menéres, P. (2022). Refractive surgery for older children and adults with accommodative esotropia: A systematic review. Ophthalmic Research, 65(4), 361–376. DOI:

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 117. DOI:

Goldsmith, L. (2021). Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2061–2076. DOI:

Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. DOI:

Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research (4th edition). SAGE.

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2. ed.). Routledge.

Heath, G., Cameron, E., Cummins, C., Greenfield, S., Pattison, H., Kelly, D., & Redwood, S. (2012). Paediatric ‘care closer to home’: Stake-holder views and barriers to implementation. Health & Place, 18(5), 1068–1073. DOI:

Herzog, C., Handke, C., & Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing talk and text II: Thematic analysis. Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Jolley, J. (2020). Introducing research and evidence-based practice for nursing and healthcare professionals. Taylor; Francis. DOI:

Jones, R. K., & Jefferis, J. M. (2017). Is qualitative research under-represented in ophthalmology journals? Eye (London), 31(8), 1117–1119. DOI:

Kandel, H., Khadka, J., Goggin, M., & Pesudovs, K. (2017). Impact of refractive error on quality of life: A qualitative study. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 45(7), 677–688. DOI:

Kiernan, M. D., & Hill, M. (2018). Framework analysis: A whole paradigm approach. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(3), 248–261. DOI:

Kuada, J. (2012). Research methodology: A project guide for university students. Samfundslitteratur.

Kuerten, D., Fuest, M., Koch, E. C., Remky, A., & Plange, N. (2015). Long term effect of trabeculectomy on retrobulbar haemodynamics in glaucoma. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 35(2), 194–200. DOI:

Kumaran, S. E., Rakshit, A., Hussaindeen, J. R., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K. (2021). Does non‐strabismic amblyopia affect the quality of life of adults? Findings from a qualitative study. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 41(5), 996–1006. DOI:

Lacey, A., & Luff, D. (2009). Qualitative data analysis. Trent Focus Sheffield.

Louison, S., Blanc, J., Pallot, C., Alassane, S., Praudel, A., Bron, A.-M., & Creuzot-Garcher, C. (2019). Visual outcomes and complications of congenital cataract surgery. Journal Francais d’Ophtalmologie, 42(4), 368–374. DOI:

Macfarlane, E., Carson-Stevens, A., North, R., Ryan, B., & Acton, J. (2022). A mixed-methods characterisation of patient safety incidents by primary eye care practitioners. Ophthalmic Physiological Optics, 2022(00), 1–12. DOI:

Midgley, N., Parkinson, S., Holmes, J., Stapley, E., Eatough, V., & Target, M. (2015). Beyond a diagnosis: The experience of depression among clinically-referred adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 44(1), 269–279. DOI:

Moghimi, S., Zandvakil, N., Vahedian, Z., Mohammadi, M., Fakhraie, G., Coleman, A. L., & Lin, S. C. (2014). Acute angle closure: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the anterior segment using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 42(7), 615–622. DOI:

Narayanan, A., Kumar, S., & Ramani, K. (2017). Spectacle compliance among adolescents: A qualitative study from Southern India. Optometry and Vision Science, 94(5), 582–587. DOI:

National Institute for Health and Care Research (UK). (2022). Health and social care delivery research. programmes/health-and-social-care-delivery-research.htm

National Institutes of Health (USA). (2022). Grants and funding.

Nowell, L., Norris, J., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative methods, 16(1). DOI:

Parkinson, S., Eatough, V., Holmes, J., Stapley, E., & Midgley, N. (2016). Framework analysis: A worked example of a study exploring young people’s experiences of depression. Qualitative research in psychology, 13(2), 109–129. DOI:

Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341–351. DOI:

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2009). Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. BMJ, 339(7723), 46–739. DOI:

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Ormston, R., & Nicholls, C. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications. 9781446296202

Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Routledge. DOI:

Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In M. Huberman & M. Miles (Eds.). SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI:

Scheffer, M., Menting, J., Roodbeen, R., van Dulmen, S., van Hecke, M., Schlingemann, R., van Nispen, R., & Boeije, H. (2022). Patients’ and health professionals’ views on shared decision‐making in age‐related macular degeneration care: A qualitative study. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 42(5), 1015–1022. DOI:

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction 3rd edition. Sociological Research Online, 11(4), 211–212. DOI:

Smith, J., Bekker, H., & Cheater, F. (2011). Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 39–51. DOI:

Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52–62. DOI:

Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance, 4(2), 72–79.

Ward, D. J., Furber, C., Tierney, S., & Swallow, V. (2013). Using framework analysis in nursing research: A worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), 2423–2431. DOI:

Wood, F., Robling, M., Prout, H., Kinnersley, P., Houston, H., & Butler, C. (2010). A question of balance: A qualitative study of mothers’ interpretations of dietary recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 8(1), 51–57. DOI:




How to Cite

Somerville, J., Jonuscheit, S., & Strang, N. (2023). Framework analysis for Vision Scientists: a clear step-by-step guide. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 16(1), 1–9.



Scientific Article