Screening for visual deficits at a rehabilitation unit early in the rehabilitation process after stroke

Authors

  • Eike Wehling University of Bergen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-3023
  • Eirik Vikane Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9393-1581
  • Siri Hanne Betten Lysgård Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Tina Taule Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-347X
  • Silje Karin Pedersen Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Anne Helen Jacobsen Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7000-3932
  • Eline A. Kordt Department of Occupational Therapy, Orthopaedical Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/sjovs.v18i1.4223

Keywords:

visual impairment, stroke, subacute, NIHSS, neurorehabilitation

Abstract

Stroke patients are not routinely screened for visual deficits despite recommendations on the importance of vision for safety and design of rehabilitation plans. The aim was to examine if it was feasible to expose rehabilitation patients to vision screening. Secondly, we aimed to examine the agreement between the vision screening and items from a neurological stroke screening tool specifically targeting vision and neglect. Over a period of 6 months, patients arriving at a rehabilitation unit after having had a stroke were consecutively included. Data on aetiology, severity, and location of the stroke, time since the original admission, scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and results from a short screening/observation battery were registered. Cohen’s kappa was calculated to examine the agreement between results from the screening/observation battery and NIHSS items. Nighty-six percent of the patients were able to undergo screening of basic visual functions. Impairment was found in 52% of the patients, and 67% of these showed impairment in more than one function. Visual impairment occurred for all levels of stroke severity. Reduced distance visual acuity was found in 15% of all patients. Accordance between the screening/observation battery and NIHSS items varied between κ = 0.36 and κ = 0.64. Screening battery vs NIHSS items showed impairment in 31% vs. 21% of patients for oculomotor deficits, 31% vs. 34% for visual field deficits and 31% vs. 29% for neglect. Results show that patients are assessable for basic visual functions early in the rehabilitation process. Items from the NIHSS cannot replace a dedicated vision screening tool because they exclude essential functions such as visual acuity, and oculomotor deficits may go undetected. Only the visual field assessment indicates substantial agreement and high sensitivity. Regarding stroke severity, agreement was substantial only in the severe group. In summary, we conclude that the NIHSS items cannot be recommended to replace systematic screening of visual function and neglect.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ali, M., Hazelton, C., Lyden, P., Pollock, A., & Brady, M. (2013). Recovery from poststroke visual impairment: Evidence from a clinical trials resource. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27 (2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968312454683

Barrett, K. M., Brott, T. G., Brown, J., R. D., Frankel, M. R., Worrall, B. B., Silliman, S. L., Case, L. D., Rich, S. S., Meschia, J. F., & Ischemic Stroke Genetics Study Group. (2007). Sex differences in stroke severity, symptoms, and deficits after first-ever ischemic stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 16(1), 34–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.11.002

Berthold‐Lindstedt, M., Johansson, J., Ygge, J., & Borg, K. (2021). How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—asking is not enough. Brain and Behavior, 11(2), e01958. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1958

Brott, T., Adams, H. J., Olinger, C., Marler, J., Barsan, W., Biller, J., Spilker, J., Holleran, R., Eberle, R., & Hertzberg, V. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke, (20). https://doi.org/doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.7.864

de Haan, G. A., Tucha, O., & Heutink, J. (2020). Effects of low visual acuity on neuropsychological test scores: A simulation study. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1596315

Falkenberg, H. K., Mathisen, T. S., Ormstad, H., & Eilertsen, G. (2020). ”Invisible” visual impairments. a qualitative study of stroke survivors; experience of vision symptoms, health services and impact of visual impairments. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 302. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05176-8

Falkenberg, H., Langeggen, I., Munthe-Kaas, R., Råen, M., Eilertsen, G., & Mathisen, T. (2024). Validation of the interdisciplinary Norwegian vision assessment tool KROSS in stroke patients admitted to hospital or rehabilitation services. Discover Health Systems, 3:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00123-4

Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., & Wade, D. T. (1990). Do visual field deficits exacerbate visuo-spatial neglect? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 53(6), 487–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.53.6.487

Hanna, K. L., Hepworth, L. R., & Rowe, F. (2017). Screening methods for post-stroke visual impairment: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(25), 2531–2543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1231846

Hazelton, C., Pollock, A., Taylor, A., Davis, B., Walsh, G., & Brady, M. C. (2019). A qualitative exploration of the effect of visual field loss on daily life in home-dwelling stroke survivors. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(7), 1264–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519837580

Hyvärinen, L., Näsänen, R., & Laurinen, P. (1980). New visual acuity test for pre‐school children. Acta Ophthalmologica, 58(4), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1980.tb08291.x

Karnath, H. O. (2001). New insights into the functions of the superior temporal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8), 568–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/35086057

Karnath, H. O., Ferber, S., & Himmelbach, M. (2001). Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature, 411(6840), 950–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/35082075

Kerkhoff, G. (2000). Neurovisual rehabilitation: Recent developments and future directions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 68(6), 691–706. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.68.6.691

Kerkhoff, G., & Schindler, I. (1997). Hemineglekt versus hemianopsie. In Fortschritte der neurologie-psychiatrie (pp. 278–289). Thieme Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-996332

Lyden, P., Lu, M., Jackson, C., Marler, J., Kothari, R., Brott, T., Zivin, J., & Investigato, N. t. S. T. (1999). Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale - results of a factor analysis. Stroke, 30(11), 2347–2354. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Str.30.11.2347

Mueller-Oehring, E., Kasten, E., Poggel, D., Schulte, T., Strasburger, H., & Sabel, B. (2010). Neglect and hemianopia superimposed. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(8), 1154–1168. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.25.8.1154.16727

NICE. (2013). Stroke rehabilitation in adults. NICE Clinical Guidelines, 1–43.

Norup, A., Guldberg, A.-M., Friis, C. R., Deurell, E. M., & Forchhammer, H. B. (2016). An interdisciplinary visual team in an acute and sub-acute stroke unit: Providing assessment and early rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation, 39(3), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-161376

Nyffeler, T., Paladini, R. E., Hopfner, S., Job, O., Nef, T., Pflugshaupt, T., Vanbellingen, T., Bohlhalter, S., Muri, R. M., Kerkhoff, G., & Cazzoli, D. (2017). Contralesional trunk rotation dissociates real vs. pseudo-visual field defects due to visual neglect in stroke patients. Frontiers in Neurology, 8, 411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00411

Pollock, A., St George, B., Fenton, M., & Firkins, L. (2012). Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. The Lancet Neruology, 11(3), 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70029-7

Ringman, J. M., Saver, J. L., Woolson, R. F., Clarke, W. R., & Adams, H. P. (2004). Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology, 63(3), 468–74. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000133011.10689.ce

Roberts, P. S., Rizzo, J. R., Hreha, K., Wertheimer, J., Kaldenberg, J., Hironaka, D., Riggs, R., & Colenbrander, A. (2016). A conceptual model for vision rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 53(6), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.06.0113

Rowe, F. J. (2013). Symptoms of stroke-related visual impairment. Strabismus, 21(2), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273972.2013.786742

Rowe, F. J. (2017). Stroke survivors’ views and experiences on impact of visual impairment. Brain and Behavior, 7 (9), e00778. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.778

Rowe, F. J., Hepworth, L., Howard, C., Bruce, A., Smerdon, V., Payne, T., Jimmieson, P., & Burnside, G. (2020). Vision screening assessment (visa) tool: Diagnostic accuracy validation of a novel screening tool in detecting visual impairment among stroke survivors. BMJ Open, 10(6), e033639. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033639

Rowe, F. J., Hepworth, L. R., Howard, C., Hanna, K. L., Cheyne, C. P., & Currie, J. (2020). High incidence and prevalence of visual problems after acute stroke: An epidemiology study with implications for service delivery. PLoS One, 14(3), e0213035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213035

Rowe, F. J., Hepworth, L. R., Howard, C., Hanna, K. L., & Currie, J. (2022). Impact of visual impairment following stroke (ivis study): A prospective clinical profile of central and peripheral visual deficits, eye movement abnormalities and visual perceptual deficits. Disabil Rehabil, 44(13), 3139–3153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1859631

Rowe, F. J., Hepworth, L. R., Howard, C., Hanna, K. L., & Helliwell, B. (2022). Developing a stroke-vision care pathway: A consensus study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(3), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1768302

Rowe, F. J., Hepworth, L. R., & Kirkham, J. J. (2019). Development of core outcome sets for vision screening and assessment in stroke: A Delphi and consensus study. BMJ Open, 9(9), e029578. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029578

Schow, T., Wehling, E. I., Falkenberg, H. K., Norup, A., & Kristensen, K. S. (2024). Assessment of visual problems after acquired brain injury: A survey of current practice in Danish hospitals. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 56, jrm28793. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.28793

Steinmetz, J. D., Bourne, R. R. A., Briant, P. S., Flaxman, S. R., Taylor, H. R. B., Jonas, J. B., Abdoli, A. A., Abrha, W. A., Abualhasan, A., & Abu-Gharbieh, E. G. (2021). Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The right to sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health, 9(2), e144–e160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7

Tao, W. D., Liu, M., Fisher, M., Wang, D. R., Li, J., Furie, K. L., Hao, Z. L., Lin, S., Zhang, C. F., Zeng, Q. T., & Wu, B. (2012). Posterior versus anterior circulation infarction how different are the neurological deficits? Stroke, 43(8), 2060–2065. https://doi.org/10.1161/Strokeaha.112.652420

Thomassen, L., Waje-Andreassen, U., Næss, H., & Brøgger, J. (2011). Behandling av cerebrovaskulære sykdommer i slagenhet. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.09.1417

Ting, D. S. J., Pollock, A., Dutton, G. N., Doubal, F. N., Ting, D. S. W., Thompson, M., & Dhillon, B. (2011). Visual neglect following stroke: Current concepts and future focus. Survey of Ophthalmology, 56(2), 114–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.08.001

Vancleef, K., Colwell, M. J., Hewitt, O., & Demeyere, N. (2022). Current practice and challenges in screening for visual perception deficits after stroke: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(10), 2063–2072. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1824245

Warren, M. (1993a). A hierarchical model for evaluation and treatment of visual perceptual dysfunction in adult acquired brain injury, part 1. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47 (1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.1.42

Warren, M. (1993b). A hierarchical model for evaluation and treatment of visual perceptual dysfunction in adult acquired brain injury, part 2. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47 (1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.1.55

Warren, M. (2006). Brain injury visual assessment battery for adults (4th ed.). Visabilities Rehabilitation Services.

Watabe, T., Suzuki, H., Abe, M., Sasaki, S., Nagashima, J., & Kawate, N. (2019). Systematic review of visual rehabilitation interventions for oculomotor deficits in patients with brain injury. Brain Injury, 33(13-14), 1592–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2019.1658225

Wehling, E., Schow, T., Kristensen, K., Vikane, E., & Falkenberg, H. K. (2024). Identifying visual impairment after acquired brain injury — current practice, referrals, and barriers. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4858210

White, U., Black, A., Wood, J., & Delbaere, K. (2015). Fear of falling invision impairment. Optometry and Vision Science, 92(6), 730–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000596

World Medical Association. (2018). Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles formedical research involving human subjects.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

Wehling, E., Vikane, E., Betten Lysgård, S. H., Taule, T., Pedersen, S. K., Jacobsen, A. H., & Kordt, E. A. (2025). Screening for visual deficits at a rehabilitation unit early in the rehabilitation process after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15626/sjovs.v18i1.4223

Issue

Section

Scientific Article

Categories